On Evil: Epstein, Satan, and Selling Babies
The darkness that is the human psyche and the pitfalls of belief
“This is what our ruling class has decided will be normal.” - SrA. Aaron Bushnell
“It was not Hitler or Himmler who abducted me, beat me, shot my family. It was the shoemaker, the milkman, the neighbor, who received a uniform and then believed they were the master race.” - Karl Stojka
TRIGGER WARNING: This article contains vivid and graphic descriptions of the reality human trafficking and related phenomena, as well as photos of the harm such slavery causes. Reader discretion is advised.
This is going to be a very long article, and it’s going to be a very dark article. It’s also probably going to piss a lot of people off as I make a lot of connections that people won’t like and won’t like to consider. For the record, you’ve been warned twice now, and there’s another warning waiting for you ahead.
Unfortunately, while I was hoping to leave it to others to sort through the Epstein files, it seems that I need to address some issues and misunderstandings. I am going to be throwing a LOT at you, dear reader, so feel free to break this up as you need to. Additionally, I’ll be presenting new leads to help direct where I believe the investigation should go from here.
I must note that I am also angry and frustrated. I apologize if that comes through to my readers, but it probably will. Please understand that this is my life’s work, and in many ways, it has absolutely destroyed me. I saw a photo of myself the other day from just before I entered the CIA. I was happy. I was smiling. I loved life. Now, I don’t even recognize that young man.
The release of the Epstein files comes as I am wrapping up nearly 20 years in the field of human trafficking and exploitation, genocide and war crimes. Unfortunately, I am seeing what has so gravely affected me now beginning to affect the general public. I recently stumbled upon an article by 🐺The Wise Wolf titled, Epstein Shocker: They Were Selling Babies, which began,
I haven’t had a drink in three years. I was a bad alcoholic, the kind that doesn’t just have a problem but becomes the problem, and getting sober was one of the hardest things I’ve ever done. I want you to know that so you understand what I’m about to tell you, which is that over the last six days I have been so drunk out of my mind that I could barely see straight, because it was the only way I could cope with what I read in the Epstein files. I bought a bottle of whiskey, I told myself it was a one-time thing, a short vacation from reality before I sat down to write this article, and I finished every drop of it. Six days of oblivion just to process what I was reading on my phone over the weekend. I got it out of my system.
That’s an entirely fair reaction to the revelations contained in the Epstein files. I and a lot of my colleagues who are in the know were expecting such a reaction from the public, if not a worse one.
Perhaps just as important to understand is that all this is being done intentionally in order to traumatize the public and provoke such reactions. I’ll let a legal expert explain how this is being done to overwhelm and stun the public into inaction. Please take the time to go through this, as it is worth understanding:
Yet, it is important to keep what we are experiencing in context: only about 2% of the some 30 terabytes of data that are the Epstein files have been released, and what has been released is hardly the worst of the material. If we are to get through this, then we need to have a real come-to-Jesus moment about some things.
It may surprise some readers, but I too am a recovering alcoholic, having recently sought help myself. Do you know what made me seek the bottle in the first place? The work I do. This is what the reality of human trafficking does to people, even as a secondhand witness. The average length of time that people stay in this field is about a year and a half. Y’all are being subjected to a distilled, weaponized form of it, so it is natural to feel overwhelmed.
When one is investigating child sexual abuse or CSAM offenses, the typical schedule for law enforcement is to spend one month on, investigating the case, and then two to three months off, working other, non-CSAM offenses. The goal is to limit one’s exposure to the offending material to preserve the officer’s mental health. Still, tragedies happen. I know of one officer who, despite all precautions, glimpsed CSAM. He reported it to his superior, who, being concerned for his welfare, sent him home for the day. Unfortunately, that wasn’t enough. The officer, a six-year veteran of the force, killed himself later that night.
I won’t get into the specifics of how investigators are limited to exposure of genocide and war crimes, as that’s optimally measured in hours, if not minutes. Again, this is to preserve the mental welfare of the investigators so that they can keep doing their work. I have not had the liberty to work in such environments that limit my exposure to these atrocities. My intent in explaining this is not to have a pity party, but rather to help the reader understand that this material does, in fact, take a serious mental toll on those dealing with it — even if you’re just reading text descriptions after the fact. Moreover, as to what follows, I get it. I get it all. I understand the need to explain it all away instead of to sit with it.
God only knows I’ve tried.
Again, responses such as those of The Wise Wolf are to be expected upon encountering this information. You’re human, and a lot of you are seeing this material for the very first time. The reality of it is hitting home for the first time, and it’s affecting your world view. Shattering your world view, in some cases. Thus, there is a larger picture that we need to consider here if we are to get through this. The author of the article cited above continued,
The Epstein leaks prove beyond any reasonable doubt that anyone who does not believe in the reality of God and the Devil is an idiot.
Right there: I’m not going to say that he’s wrong (I can’t prove that for obvious reasons), but I will rather state that comments such as this reveal something about our understanding of human trafficking that we need to really, really work on, as even a lot of people in the anti-trafficking world don’t seem to realize how deep the phenomenon goes and how it ultimately hinders our ability to eradicate this scourge from our world.
I totally understand the need to explain this all away as being the work of supernatural actors, but no. Stop that. Bad wolf. No biscuit. Let’s actually nip this in the bud right now, because this is part of the mechanism of power and control that enabled Epstein’s crimes (and so, so many others) in the first place, and which will enable even further atrocities if we don’t stop it here and now. We’re dealing with people, the actions of people, and how they interact to exploit other people. Trafficking, as I’ve said before, is all about power and control, as are all forms of abuse.
This includes religious and spiritual forms of abuse.
Furthermore, trafficking, like abuse, involves a vicious cycle — especially once one understands the concept of retrafficking. It’s why I chose Jörmungandr as representative of the serpent of slavery. It’s the ouroboros, the snake eating it’s tail, forever without end until it rends the world. Unless the head is firmly separated from the body, the cycle will renew and continue unimpeded. That’s why the Epstein files are so important: they offer us a chance to break out from the old cycle, but only if we have the courage and strength to do so.
For the record, I am seeing a lot of my best friends (yes, I do actually have those) and colleagues making the same mistakes across all platforms as the author of the aforementioned article did, so I do not want anyone, least of all that author, to think I am singling him out. What is occurring is a very common human psychological phenomena — but it’s one that we need to address in order to really bring about a better world for us all. Strap in folks, this is really gonna suck, but I’m going to be as gentle as I can be.
The reality of human trafficking, and the investigative process
Before we get into matters of the supernatural and the mechanisms of belief, let’s examine some of the larger claims made in the originally cited article, as well as others that are circling due to the release of the Epstein files.
Have I seen evidence of cannibalism as an aspect of human trafficking? Yes, I’ve seen it before, albeit only in historical context: in fact, I must warn you, you’ll see an example soon if you keep reading. But this is so incredibly, exceedingly rare that it distracts from the larger phenomena of human trafficking and the subject simply doesn’t arise in relation to modern trafficking. People simply don’t traffic human beings for food — there is no demand for human meat as there is for labor or sex. For specifics on this dynamic, see Chapter 4 of Jörmungandr — again, the book is free.
What about ritual human sacrifice? Now yes, this I have seen before. In Jörmungandr, I documented it as having occurred among the Russian Armed Forces using captured Ukrainian prisoners as the sacrifices (see Chapter 11). But again, this is very rare. I only know of a couple instances of this genuinely occurring, and I cannot disclose the details of those cases for fear of impeding ongoing investigations.
Do traffickers use code words to hide what they’re talking about? Yes — as do most criminals. Does that mean that’s what’s going on in these files, especially as it pertains to matters of cannibalism? No. We don’t have evidence of that. Could “pizza” be a code word for some kind of sex party? Yes. Or it could mean that Epstein was a fan of Italian food. Same with “tacos, burgers, jerky, grape soda, and fish.”
For the record, these aren’t common sex trafficking terms. If I were to create a fake escort ad (e.g. for a sting operation) to catch predators and if I laced the ad with terminology about tacos, fish, and jerky, I wouldn’t catch anybody because nobody would know what the hell I was talking about.
This is literally PizzaGate and QAnon all over again, and I suspect that’s intentional on the part of the administration: we don’t know enough yet to meet the evidentiary standard of the burden of proof when it comes to this specific claim, because the DOJ is intentionally hiding a lot of evidence that we need in order to understand this criminal network. We could be misinterpreting a dark dead baby joke or an intentionally wrongly redacted photo as evidence of something that we don’t actually have evidence for.
From the original article discussed:
The word “pizza” appears over 900 times in Epstein’s emails, which would be a bizarre dietary obsession for anyone, let alone a convicted child sex trafficker who spent most of his time on private islands and in Manhattan townhouses. The reason this matters, for anyone who still thinks Pizzagate was just an unhinged Reddit theory, is that the FBI has maintained for years a documented glossary of coded language used by predator networks. Hot dog means boy. Pizza means girl. Cheese means little girl. Pasta means little boy. Ice cream means male prostitute. Map means semen. This is the FBI’s own intelligence, compiled from their own investigations into trafficking rings, and it maps almost perfectly onto the language patterns saturating Epstein’s correspondence.
Umm, again, no. Like I just said, this is literally PizzaGate and QAnon all over again. These aren’t common sex trafficking terms. Not even on the Dark Web. I know because not only have I led investigations into such trafficking and CSAM networks, but I have also trained the investigators who go out and conduct the investigations into these networks as well as who scrape the sites to gather the data to understand sex trafficking lingo, thereby constructing the word lists in the first place. As such, and directly to the point, I have the DHS lists the author references, as well as a few unpublished ones that make the rounds in only a few select circles.
While some (one, 1, uno, واحد, один) of these terms are on these lists (and I’m not going to tell you which one), they are being horribly misconstrued to the public as to what they indicate. Others — that is, most — that the author references (and that many others have claimed are evidence of code words) aren’t even on there. Do you know what else is actually on there? Literally hundreds of other keywords and emojis that can appear in tens of thousands – if not hundreds of thousands – of combinations.
This obsession with coded language is so far off the mark that y’all chose the few emojis that actually aren’t indicators of sex trafficking!
Of those (again, those meaning one) that do make the lists, has to use one’s brain and actually analyze these characters in the context in which they appear rather than just using a keyword search like a brain-dead Snopes writer or a wild-eyed Quadzilla. It takes genuine expertise and training to make the connections to genuine cases of abuse and trafficking. Does the pizza emoji appear next to an ad for a pizza shop, such as at Comet Ping Pong Pizzeria? Then it’s probably safe to assume that it’s not sex trafficking related. One would naturally assume an ice cream parlor to use ice cream emojis, and a hot dog stand to use hot dog emojis in their advertising. A juice stand might use grape emojis, just as a candy store might use lollipop or candy emojis. But what about if one of those emojis appears, for instance, next to photos of young Asian women on an ad for a massage parlor? Well, that probably merits a closer look. That’s out of place; that’s suspicious.
Thus these claims are almost completely bullshit, and such misinformation does real harm and damage to our efforts to recover victims of the trafficking networks. One can mean very well while still doing incredible amounts of harm. In fact, that’s pretty much how the entire anti-trafficking movement works. Please, please don’t regurgitate such claims without checking with an actual expert.
Or perhaps not even then — I’ve seen what passes for an “expert” in this field. At the same time, please don’t feel bad that you need to have this explained to you, because I’ll be the first to tell you that the vast majority of cops (let alone feds) can’t figure this out either.
As for “pizza” appearing over 900 times in some 3.5 million documents… that seems entirely reasonable. People email about food and pizza parties all the time. That’s not evidence of a crime.
I’m also not seeing evidence of “ritual sacrifice.” By the same token, I don’t see any evidence of Satan worship. Let me explain.
First, is there evidence of a ritual? Is there wax from candles? Soot from something being burned? Offerings? Any items that clearly aren’t utilitarian in function, but that don’t otherwise serve as mere decoration? Is there anything that indicates that there was a structured, repeated, and ceremonial process that took place in which a human being was murdered in a very precise and specific manner?
The answer is a clear “no.” Don’t get me wrong, there’s evidence of people being killed, but not as part of any sort of ritual. If there was, then we would move on to posit whether or not deity worship was involved, what the purpose of the ritual was, etc. From there, we might be able to interpret if there was some ritualistic purpose to worship Satan or other deity. But seeing as there’s no evidence of a ritual in the first place, we don’t even need to chase this line of inquiry.
This is the tragic reality, and this is what I really need people to start understanding at this point in this process: people kill people all the time. People also rape and abuse children, women and men all the time, too. People murder infants. People rape infants. That’s the reality of this horror.
People get murdered in human trafficking all the time. A great many victims simply don’t survive. It’s literally why we call survivors “survivors.” Moreover, you don’t need my expertise to know this: you just need to believe survivors. If you believed the countless women or men like Sascha Riley when he first came forward, y’all wouldn’t be so shocked and mentally unwell as you now are, and we’d be well on our way to actually investigating and holding these monsters accountable.
Just as importantly, none of this means the trafficker, rapist, or perpetrator screamed, “hail, Satan!” while committing their crime. We’re changing their motive just to feel better about ourselves and our capacity to do evil as a coping mechanism. This is exceptionally dangerous, because if we pursue offenders (especially those involved with human trafficking or child exploitation) based upon a mistaken motive, we’re not going to recover their victims, nor are we going to succeed at trial in locking these perps away.
A pedophile doesn’t rape a child because their deity commands it. A pedophile rapes a child because he or she and he or she alone wants to rape that child, and whatever justification for doing so is made up afterwards. Pedophilia is rooted to the sex drive in the brain at the neurological level. Not to some external motivation or psychological construct, such as religious belief. Most traffickers traffic in human beings because they can make money from it — it’s a financial crime motivated by greed.
As a specific example of mistaken motives, the 764 Network, responsible for much of the sextortion epidemic, is frequently cited as being a Satanic, Neo-Nazi organization with ritualistic activities. One doesn’t have to look very hard to find media depictions of the network as such. However, investigations (of which I know the lead investigators) have shown that these are not the primary motivations; rather, it’s a nihilistic sense of sadism. At their core, they like hurting people. The individuals behind the crimes adopt Satanic and Neo-Nazi imagery after the fact to mask their underlying motives and behavior.
One must be careful not to confuse sadism, a psychological trait, with Satanism, a belief system. The motive of sadism carries through to the Epstein network, much as it does the Trump administration: the cruelty is the point, as they say.
Yet, most people have no experience with true criminal sadism, hence the confusion with Satanism. People assume others to be perfectly rational actors, like they presume themselves to be. Unfortunately, this assumption can prove disastrous, such as when dealing with dictators like Putin on a global stage. This is precisely why we need to go deeper. And unfortunately, we need to have a conversation about dear old Lucifer himself.
On Satanism, belief, and responsibility
There are two key psychological concepts that we need to be familiar with before moving on. The first is confirmation bias. Confirmation bias affects the way we interpret new information that is presented to us; specifically, we tend to interpret new information in a way that confirms what we already believe. We’ll go so far as to even seek out and favor evidence that supports what we want to be true and what we already believe to be true all while ignoring contradictory evidence. In short, we are psychologically inclined to start with a predetermined belief and seek evidence to support that belief.
Combined with confirmation bias is cognitive dissonance. Essentially, cognitive dissonance is a state of mental discomfort caused by holding two or more contradicting beliefs at the same time. The more the internal conflict relates to one’s central worldview, or core beliefs, the stronger the dissonance, or discomfort, will be. The brain seeks to remove the feeling of discomfort by rationalizing or avoiding new information, often working hand in hand with confirmation bias to interpret information in a way that reinforces the original worldview — even if the new information actually contradicts that worldview.
Here’s how this affects what we’re talking about: if one already believes in a God and a Devil, that worldview might actually be reinforced when confronted with evidence to the contrary, such as something so horribly emotionally traumatizing that one has no real explanation for it. Our Wolf friend gave us a perfect example of this earlier: look at this evil! Anyone who does not believe in the reality of the Devil is an idiot.
If one does not share this belief, if one has a purely atheistic point of view, free of supernatural influence and workings, then the idea that the world is seemingly free of such deities could also be reinforced. So much for God, such an individual might think.
It’s not good or bad, it just is. That’s how our brains work. I’m not arguing that one way or the other is better, my concern is with aspects of power and control, and how our beliefs — whatever they may be — can be used against us.
The mind seeks familiarity in order to protect itself, especially when confronted with something so terrible and so challenging to core beliefs. And for the first time in a lot of people’s lives, they’re facing a reality that many of us have always known, but that they’ve been sheltered from. It’s the same reason you have such a hard time changing others’ minds: new facts challenge worldviews until those facts have been integrated into that worldview — typically in a way that doesn’t upset the core beliefs.
And let’s be honest: a lot of people are feeling as if the world is collapsing around them right now.
Benjamin Life put this very well in his article, After the Black Pill:
There is a particular quality of silence that descends when someone realizes they’ve been lied to about something fundamental. It is not the silence of confusion, nor of processing. It is the silence of the floor giving way, the extended moment of pause before the fall, when the body has not yet registered that there is no longer anything beneath it.
Millions of people are entering that silence now.
As the Epstein files are being released, heavily redacted and strategically curated as they are, they accomplish something that was never supposed to happen: they are making visible the shape of the cage.
We were told a story about the world. In this story, power flows upward through merit. Institutions, whatever their flaws, exist to serve the people who built them. The worst crimes are committed by deviants at the margins, caught and punished by systems designed to protect the innocent. The people at the top arrived there through some combination of talent and luck and determination, and while they may be flawed, while they may be greedy or vain or out of touch, they are still, fundamentally, people like us. Playing by recognizable rules. Constrained by laws and norms and the basic moral grammar that makes civilization possible.
The files show something different.
They show that at the highest levels of power, in the offices and islands and private planes where the trajectory of nations is shaped, a different set of rules applies. They show networks of complicity that span continents and decades. They show that the men who lecture us about justice and progress and the rule of law have participated in the most inhuman acts imaginable. They show that this behavior was not aberration but the price of entry into rooms where the real decisions are made.
They show, in short, that the story was a lie. Not a flawed story, not an incomplete story, but a deliberately constructed fiction designed to keep us looking in the wrong direction while the actual operations of power proceeded unobserved.
To reckon with what is being revealed requires more than updating a handful of beliefs. It requires the willingness to let an entire world collapse, a world in which things basically make sense, in which the institutions basically function, in which the worst possibilities are basically kept in check by the people whose job it is to check them.
That world is not real. It was never real.
What people are experiencing right now is a phenomenon called ontological shock. This sort of shock is a profound, often extremely traumatic form of disorientation when one’s fundamental understanding of reality or how the universe works is shattered.
Imagine that you’re a 12th century European peasant, for instance, and suddenly an F-14 Tomcat lands, the pilot hops out, and he then proceeds to explain to you that he possesses in his pocket a device that he can use to communicate with anyone in the world, but that he primarily uses it to look at cats on something he calls the “internet.”
You’re going to be disoriented, and you’re probably going to accuse that pilot of witchcraft before the day is out.
Now, that accusation doesn’t mean that you’re stupid. It doesn’t mean that you’re being silly. It means that the explanation of witchcraft is the only explanation that exists within your 12th century worldview for what you’re witnessing.
That’s very much what’s happening now with the Epstein files. Your old worldview has been abruptly challenged, and your cognitive dissonance is rapidly forcing you to re-evaluate your worldview. Naturally, you’re looking to preserve as much of the old worldview as possible, because humans simply don’t like change.
In such instances, it is very tempting to blame the Devil for such a worldview collapse; even more so for such horrors as are contained in the Epstein files. It’s tempting to call such people “Satanists” and “demonic” to explain away their actions. As our minds reach out for an explanation, any explanation, for this great lie, obviously we turn toward the great deceiver. But that is a serious mistake.
Satanism is a very specific belief system and ideology. It has its own structure and tenets. Some variants even have their own holidays and festivals, although that is typically seen more in Luciferianism than it is in typical Satanism (and yes, there’s a difference). The point is, it’s like any other faith or belief system. There are even agnostic versions for those who don’t actually believe in God or the Satan, but who still identify with the ideology (this is the majority of Satanists; gnostic Satanists, that is Satanists who genuinely believe in and worship a metaphysical Satan, tend to be in the minority of Satanists). I’ll refer those curious about the differences and origins to Chapter 2 of Jörmungandr.
None of this is to say that Satanists don’t hurt and abuse children, commit murder, or commit acts of rape. They do. Just look at the Order of Nine Angles (actually, don’t look into that if you know what’s good for you — but know that I find it incredibly ironic that some Satanic sect has directly empowered violent, extremist far-right groups like Atomwaffen Division and not, say, some LGBT+ group that the religious right always claims it does). Yet, they are such a small percentage of offenders that they honestly don’t even merit discussion except to be noted as the remarkable exception.
Here’s what’s important: Epstein didn’t need Satan. The psychology of denial is particularly important here, and we have to be careful about labeling people “demonic” and their actions “Satanic.” It’s an act of dehumanization, and it’s one step on the slope down to discrimination, persecution, and outright genocide. In fact, it’s largely how we got here in the first place. We simply must not become what we are now fighting against — that’s why it is so important to break this cycle.
Much more importantly, Epstein wasn’t even all that special. What makes the Epstein case significant is that he catered to the wealthy and the elite among our societies. There are thousands if not hundreds of thousands of men like Epstein out there, and an equal number of Maxwells who simply do not. You’ve probably passed one on the way to work this morning, and you definitely passed one of their victims.
Moreover, and I feel it is important to stress this point, such crimes aren’t limited to the “Epstein class.” I’ve seen countless cases of trafficking and pedophilia by individuals who aren’t billionaires. In fact, the vast majority of the investigations I’ve led haven’t involved anyone of any particular wealth or status, but rather everyday people. Walk into any youth or domestic violence shelter, and the victims won’t be those of politicians or banker elites. Evil, as the student of Hannah Arendt knows, is truly banal.
The truth is much more horrible and arguably indigestible than a few evil people chanting in a dark room or swapping emails on Gmail (by the way, totally not to foreshadow anything coming, but hi, Google!).
Let’s take a closer look at what I mean:
Note the dates: this isn’t ancient history. This has been going on uninterrupted, and people are alive today who can still remember these crimes. A lot of you just had the privilege not to know about it, hence why Epstein’s offenses seem so shocking. I could really go into some history here, but others have done it better than I ever could.
Now, did Satan worshipers do this? Were all these innocents sacrificed in some Satanic ritual, complete with references to pizza and ice cream?
Or was this the doing of the followers of the Abrahamic faiths? The faiths named after the very same dude who is literally only famous for his attempt to ritualistically sacrifice his child to his deity?
Now consider Gaza. Sudan. Bosnia. Guatemala. Rwanda. The Holocaust. Satan didn’t do that. People did. People who believe in the God of the Bible, the God of the Talmud, and the God of the Doctrine of Discovery. This is not Satanism. These are your own beliefs. You believe many of the exact same things as the people who committed these atrocities. Hell, you probably contributed to or at least looked the other way for at least one of these mass atrocities.
Jeffrey Epstein was Jewish, for crying out loud. He didn’t worship Satan. And before anyone wants to run with any antisemitic theories here, I’ve never known any Jew to actually imbibe baby’s blood, no matter what crime they are guilty of. As for Christians, however, Catholics ritualistically claim to consume the flesh and blood of the alleged savior every Sunday (and sometimes Wednesday!) and call that “holy.” And if you dare to say that’s just bread and wine, you clearly haven’t heard the doctrine of transubstantiation. Make no mistake, Epstein’s friends, associates, and fellow rapists and pedophiles were Christian, Muslim, Buddhist, Hindu, etc. They weren’t Satanists.
Now, let’s not leave the ever-so-clever Atheists out of this. Richard Dawkins himself dined with Epstein. Then of course there’s Lawrence Krauss, Noam Chomsky, and don’t let me forget Elevatorgate, which ten years after the fact in 2021, people were still excusing. There were so many red flags that all these “rational” friends of Epstein chose to intentionally ignore instead of daring to believe women. Yes, Epstein might have been the mastermind of things recently, but we all certainly played along, didn’t we?
Not so incidentally, it’s worth noting that the narrative present in Elevatorgate can clearly be seen in Gamergate a few years later. A lot of the same players (pardon the pun) were involved in both incidents.
Blaming Satan — or feminists in the latter cases — is an effective means to distance ourselves from and excuse our own culpability in these atrocities. After all, Do we men not benefit from misogyny? Do we all not benefit from the proceeds of slavery? Are our computers and phones not powered by cobalt mined by slaves in the Congo, our clothes mass produced by the forced labor of the Uyghurs, and the porn we consume the product of sex trafficking?
Just have a can of tuna or a cup of coffee. That’s how profuse and widespread this problem is — both of those products are slave-produced. Congratulations — if you’re of the mindset that such proceeds are of the Devil, then logically, that means you’ve partaken in such imbibing of Satanic ritual products as well.
But let’s back up.
Psychologically, it is easier to blame this all on Satan than to accept responsibility and change. It is easier to blame women such as Rebecca Watson for being victims of our own sexism that we subject them to than it is to admit that we are sexist and attempt to do better. And It’s so much easier to just blame Epstein than to admit we benefited from the exact same system that he did. That’s why it’s always Satan that tricked me. I was deceived by someone else. Never, “I fucked up and I own that, let me make it right.” Never, “I was a part of something evil.” And certainly never, “this was my fault.”
Human beings are an incredibly self-absorbed species.
By blaming Satan, or women, or “extremists,” or whoever, we’re quite conveniently giving this very human evil an escape route and another mechanism to hide rather than confront the fact that these perpetrators and this evil hides in our very own faiths, religious institutions, and beliefs — including every single one in the world. And that it has existed there since time immemorial.
And this is why so many people still support the likes of Trump, Putin, and Netanyahu. This is evangelical Christianity. It’s Messianic Judaism. It’s Orthodoxy. That’s the ultimate DARVO of QANON: it’s not Satan, but what we call the “holy.”
That is ultimately how deep the corruption goes. And make no mistake, the system isn’t broken — it’s working exactly as intended, just as it always has. If we want to truly behead this snake, then we must give it no escape, no matter what “traditions” it costs us. One must always remember that most dangerous phrase in the English language is, “we have always done it this way.”
Consider the following quote from spiritual guru Deepak Chopra, pulled directly from the Epstein files:
God is a construct. Cute girls are real.
They know they’re selling you “spiritual” lies all while laughing about exploiting women and children in private. Keep in mind that Chopra and the likes of Dawkins, et. al. would frequently “debate:” despite all being connected to the same trafficking network.
It’s all a lie, including the “debate” itself.
This is not the hand of the Devil, nor that of demons, nor even aliens; instead, it is the work of people who worship the exact same Gods that you do. Maybe, if you really do believe in spiritual energies and in not “feeding negative entities,” then just maybe offering up that energy and prayers to the very same deities that Epstein and other predators worship isn’t such a good idea.
Aren’t things awful enough without having to invent new claims? Isn’t that why we’re freaking out in the first place right now?
Yet, in making sense of the Epstein madness and our leaders’ culpability therein, we must remember that it is not Trump himself who is abducting our neighbors, nor Netanyahu who is personally slaughtering children in Gaza, nor was it Putin who raped and massacred in Bucha. Those were the crimes of everyday people, absolutely no different than you or me. And it is acknowledgement of that fact that we are terrified of confronting. Unfortunately, our refusal to do so has cost us countless lives to date.
This fact goes beyond the supernatural that people worship. Recently, it became known that it was none other than Jeffrey Epstein who funded Bitcoin. In the linked article, someone by the pseudonym of Crypto Bitlord stated, “We’ve basically funded an elite global pedophile ring since 2015. I feel sick.” That particular date is particularly important, and I ask that you keep it in your head for a moment.
I posted about this on Substack, noting that, “I’m the motherfucker who trained people to hunt CSAM offenders on the darkweb. Y’all knew.”
Almost immediately, someone responded, “Epstein had nothing to do with me buying Bitcoin. Nothing.”
Okay. I mean, that was an oddly defensive for a comment that wasn’t directed at you, bro.
Here’s why I stand by my original comment, and why I felt the response was so telling: the takedown of the CSAM website Playpen also occurred in 2015. Playpen used cryptocurrency payments on the Darkweb for transactions, including access to the site and for purchase of CSAM materials. Specifically, they used the predominant cryptocurrency of the time: Bitcoin.
So again, no. Y’all knew what was going on from the beginning. You may not have known it was specifically a pedophile by the name of Jeffrey Epstein driving the technology and price, but you knew it was being driven by organized crime (the Silk Road was online in 2011 for crying out loud), human trafficking, and horrific child exploitation. You don’t get to claim you didn’t know.
Take some personal responsibility and stop blaming the dark lord — and alternatively women — for what you yourself are complicit in. Again, it’s just people. And people can be far worse than the devil himself, believe me. Now, y’all should be happy that we’re not fighting demons and Satan: people are easy to fight. People can be killed if needbe. Satan, not so much. Yet, I suspect many will reject this notion simply because it triggers their cognitive dissonance.
This is us. This is who we are.
And until we confront, accept that fact, and consciously make a choice to do better, this horror will continue. As I wrote in Jörmungandr,
The perpetrators of the crimes described here are quite certainly not demons. They are not aliens, nor are they any form of god, specter, vampire, boogeyman or monster under the bed. Despite the mind games, the elaborate rituals, the misinformation, and the psychological operations, our enemies always were, and remain, human. And just like any other human being, they can be defeated. Rarely do these mendacious human predators come from without; rather, they come from within our own communities and our own homes; they look like us, they sound like us, the speak the same language as us, they believe the same things that we do, and they may even be us – and telling ourselves otherwise has only prolonged the problem.
Aliens and evil Satanists (and I guess women?! I’m so fucking confused, guys) that need to be defeated are cool. They give us a chance to role play the hero. Unlike, you know, the real us. The us that’s responsible for all of this madness. Again, it’s catharsis. It’s an escape.
But it’s not reality.
Another very real danger is that actual predators and PSYOP operators will play into the whole “Satanic” thing to keep you from cleaning out your own house. You know — sort of exactly like Epstein did with 4Chan and QAnon. Just as with spinning the saucers (seriously, read the book), it’s a useful distraction technique: no, they say, there’s not a systemic problem in your church — keep the faith! It’s just the work of Satan. No need to question us, your dear, beloved authority figures.
Moreover, and as a colleague recently pointed out to me, it is a terror tactic to make others simply believe that one is a Satanist. Seriously, look at Jared Fogle and Mr. Zombie again — which one would you feel safer randomly encountering in a back alley? Yet, which one has raped children? For crying out loud, the other one doesn’t even eat yogurt because of the ethical implications (seriously, google it).
Satanists are scary. They wield black magic and curses. They can conjure supernatural forces and command demons that one doesn’t know how to defend against. They wear, I guess, what some people consider to be frightening clothes, mascara, and tattoos. It makes people afraid to even confront them in the first place, whereas a trafficker or pedophile — well, they can be rendered inert by slapping a pair of bracelets on them. They’re cowards, often relying solely on their victim’s own fear, trauma, confusion, and sense of shame to stay out of prison.
Stop making these people scarier than they actually are and start punching back.
To this point, let’s not forget how PizzaGate and QAnon started: it was due to Russians hacking Clinton’s and other’s emails at the DNC to help Donald Trump win office in 2016. Who all was involved in that PSYOP? A certain pedophile whose files we’re now talking about, perhaps?
I’d be remiss if I didn’t point out the Former Israeli Minister of Defense under Netanyahu, Ehud Barak, was also part of that conversation. For some reason, a remarkable amount of people can’t hold two things to be true at the same time.
I suppose this is what I find so frustrating: people are willing to consider the hand of the supernatural, but not Elon? Even when we now know his buddy Epstein was involved in manipulating the 2016 election through the same methods? Even when France is openly investigating Musk for doing the same thing there? Especially when we know that they’re attempting to rig the 2026 midterms? This didn’t happen by magic: we know how it took place.
There is a larger picture here, and we need to stay focused: when I went whistleblower, we made it clear that the Epstein files were the key as to why the 2024 elections were stolen. We had means, opportunity, and now we have motive: but now all anyone can talk about is Satan, aliens, and time travel. That seems intentional. In fact, I know it to be intentional. Note the date on the following post that I cited in Chapter 11 of Jörmungandr:
We actually warned that this would all happen. Now, on the very day on which Prince Andrew was arrested for his involvement with Epstein, Trump suddenly announced that he’s declassifying anything and everything to do with “aliens.”
Please do not fall for this trick. We must not let what we want to be true keep us from holding those involved in crimes against humanity responsible for their actions in a continual “wait and see,” bait and switch game — especially when it’s been a known PSYOP since the 1950s.
We are being played to keep us distracted from the facts.
With that understood, I feel the following document, combined with the one from the Epstein files linked above and dated August 29, 2016, to be particularly relevant to this aspect of motive in the 2024 theft:
I don’t know how to make this any clearer: the bad guys want you seeing Satanists and aliens (and radical, extremist feminists) where there are none because it takes the attention off of them. By this time I had hoped people wouldn’t be falling for this, yet here I am, having to point it out once again.
Hell, forget the Epstein files — release the Vatican files. And then let’s get into the Islamic Clerics’ files, and the Monks’ files, and the Swamis’ files, because this is a global problem and we’ve only begun to see the tip of the iceberg here. Disclosure is dark, as they say. Really, really fucking dark.
I don’t say this to condemn religion. I don’t say this to condemn spirituality. I don’t say this to condemn belief in our friends from out of town. And obviously, none of this is limited to religious communities. I say this because our brains are fucking weird, and it prevents us from seeing atrocities right in front of our eyes. Thus, we need to challenge ourselves, our beliefs, and think about how we contribute to this problem, and we need to do that in ways we have never done before in our collective history. Unfortunately, introspection is often the hardest thing to do.
As I asked in the conclusion to Jörmungandr, what atrocities have we been groomed and conditioned to commit and accept? What suffering have we just ignored as normal and acceptable? What have we done and how have we contributed to this hell?
The answer is: a lot.
Let’s bring this back to what originally triggered the initial reaction documented: that Epstein and co. were “selling babies.” Yes, indeed they were. And we need to have a deep conversation about infant laundering and the global adoptions industry.
Infant laundering, adoptions, and the abortion “debate”
This was, and still is, going to be a volume 2 thing, but we also need to discuss this now. I hope you’re still with me, because everything we’ve talked about gets worse. The technical term for “selling babies” is infant laundering, and it’s a major form of human trafficking. Unfortunately, it' often goes hand-in-hand with adoption, to the point that the origins of the modern adoption industry can be traced to a notorious infant trafficker by the name of Georgia Tann.
Presented as offering a loving, permanent home to a child in need and providing a safe, nuclear family and a secure environment for the child, the reality of adoption often more closely mirrors the needs and interests of the adoptive parents than those of the child. To better understand this phenomenon, let’s review a case of surrogacy and infant trafficking that I presented in Jörmungandr:
A wealthy couple (such as from Australia) finds a surrogate mother in a poor country (such as a street vendor in Thailand) to birth the couple’s child. Such transnational surrogacy agreements are often highly coercive and grant extensive rights to the wealthy foreign couple at the expense of the impoverished mother. Moreover, with no current international framework regulating such agreements, there’s no guarantee that surrogates will actually be paid upon delivery (pun not intended) again raising clear issues as to labor trafficking (Parker, 2015-2016; see also Koppelman 1990, Koppelman, 2010).
In the Thailand case, the expectant mother learned that one of the two twins she was carrying had Down Syndrome and she was subsequently told to undergo an abortion by the Australian couple (again, we see the issue of eugenics arise). She refused, citing her Buddhist faith and the accompanying doctrine of nonviolence. She thus carried both fetuses to term and successfully delivered both babies, only to have the couple adopt the child without Down Syndrome. This case once again revealed something that adopted children worldwide have known for millennia: adoptive parents are extremely picky and self-serving when it comes to which children they will adopt.
The birth mother was left to care for the disabled baby on her own – and was never paid the full amount she was due. The case began to garner international media attention when it became known that the paternal/adoptive father had a whopping twenty-two child sex crime convictions against him, and that such a scheme likely was the only legal loophole available to him to acquire a child and thus appease his pedophilic predilections (Howard, 2014; Parker, 2015-2016).
Now certainly not all adoptions are this way, and many adoptions result in loving families. Yet when a prospective “parent” can pay a fee (or a “donation”) to have a child placed with them, then there is more going on than this loving, happy family narrative provides for — and the door is left wide open to abuse of both the children and the system as a whole: the very dynamic itself is poisoned. Lest you doubt me, I am prepared to bring receipts.
Literal, itemized receipts.
I have many of these from “adoptees” who have found out that their parents simply bought them as an infant. In fact, such “fee” structures are the norm when it comes to both private domestic adoptions and the international adoptions industry, which is arguably just one giant infant laundering scheme dressed up with nice words. Often, I am sent these documents after a parent dies or someone discovers such documents tucked away in an attic, and the victim simply wants someone to know what happened. There is often no justice in these cases, and the children are left to find whatever form of peace they can on their own.
Such trafficking in the adoptions industry leaves adoptees feeling like show trophies, unloved, and for display purposes only. In such cases children have been adopted simply for their parents to virtue signal how great, generous, and moral they were, even though they viewed their children as utterly disposable props. Often, the children were subject to terrible abuse, and in some cases pedophiles adopt children in this manner specifically to exploit them.
Now, before you exclaim how horrible this all is, let me ask you this: why would the parents not treat them in such a way? Especially in such a paternalistic society?
They bought them, after all. It’s simple consumer capitalism. And it’s how the adoptions process originated and continues to this day. Moreover, who is really going to stop them?
Simply put, what people are suddenly discovering in the Epstein files are the real, lived experiences of countless human beings across the entire world. What is horrifying so many people really, in the end, is nothing new: those who are horrified just have never before had to be exposed to these realities.
Yet again we return to the issues of power, control, and privilege. Adoption of infant or orphaned children has a long history that commingles with acts of imperialism, genocide, and campaigns of extermination and assimilation. As I documented extensively in Chapter 11 of Jörmungandr, war is very good for business.
Wrapped in humanitarian notions and doublespeak of “rescuing children” and “reconnecting families,” Russia’s genocide of Ukrainians has coincided with the kidnapping of tens of thousands of Ukrainian children who, despite still having family in Ukraine, have been placed with Russian parents for assimilation, or have been found in North Korean training camps as child soldiers. The same process has been documented in Israel’s genocide of Palestine, where IDF soldiers heroically “rescue” orphaned Gazan infants, placing them with new, Jewish Israeli families inside Israel. Never mind who had martyred the child’s parents, or that the children had other family members still alive.
As a demonstration of how deep the euphemistic doublespeak goes in this process, Georgia Tann, the aforementioned child trafficker and woman who largely birthed the modern Child Protective Services (CPS) system and adoption industry through her trafficking operation, is still listed primarily as a “social worker” by Wikipedia.
Speaking of trafficking, CPS, and adoption, being poor or belonging to a different culture is often enough for Child Protective Services to become involved with a family and place a child in foster care. These vulnerabilities often intersect with racial and ethnic status (see Jörmungandr, Chapter 8).
In Oklahoma for instance, Indigenous populations account for only 9% of the overall population, yet account for over 35% of those in the foster care system. Again, the connection to genocide, colonialism, and systems of marginalization cannot be overlooked, nor can the fact that many experts refer to foster care as “a revolving door” for the commercial sexual exploitation of children.
Indeed, CPS and foster care services have long been weaponized against Black, Indigenous, and other marginalized families and children. This form of policing of the family adds additional strains and pressures to family members, often forcing parents to live apart from one another and traumatizing the child either through the process of living through a divorce or by growing up in “the system.” Such pressures and policing reduce already limited economic opportunities, perpetuating a cycle of poverty. Again, we see the mechanisms of power and control at play.
Naturally, where one has poverty, one has crime due to increased desperation to survive and simply make ends meet. “Crime” is also a useful construct in structures of power and control. One can make crime levels increase or decrease simply by changing laws. Thus, it can be used to pressure populations and limit their options by branding more of that population “criminal.”
This is where we find the connection between “crime” and the child trafficking industry: the legalization and open access to abortion services has dramatically reduced the crime rate in the United States. From Jörmungandr,
The legalization of abortion following Roe in 1973 led to some rather interesting consequences that are intricately connected to what we just discussed, including the increased poverty rate and developmental outcomes following women and families who are denied abortions. The Roe decision led to a significant drop in the crime rate in the 1990s as the generation born following Roe came of age (Levitt, 2005; Dubner, 2019). In 2001, the data suggested that the legalization of abortion, and thus the resulting ability of women to choose when to have children, would result in approximately 1% drop in crime per year for the next two decades (Donohue & Levitt, 2020).
The findings of this remarkable study are applicable beyond the United States. Data from Europe published in 2014 found that increased access to abortion services dramatically decreased the crime rates in the countries where it was legalized (Francois, Magni-Berton, & Weill, 2014). Interestingly, this cross cultural study found a decrease in the homicide rate across multiple countries whereas the American study did not, perhaps reflecting the unique American exceptionalism around the subject of murder.25 In the U.S., the legalization of abortion in 1973 is estimated to have led to a 6% reduction in out-of-wedlock teen birth rates between 1991 and 2002 (Donohue, Grogger, & Levitt, 2009); teenage pregnancy is, of course, a key driver of maternal crime and a major trafficking vulnerability. A follow-up study found that legalized abortion resulted in a 17.5% drop in overall crime from 1998 to 2014, or approximately 1% a year. From 1991 to 2014, violent crime (including homicide) and property crime each fell by approximately 50%. Legalized abortion, it turns out, accounts for an estimated 47% reduction of violent crime and 33% reduction of property crime for this period (Donohue & Levitt, 2020).
Suddenly a lot should begin to make sense, but allow me to clarify. The right to choose when and if to have children has allowed women to better plan families, admittedly resulting in fewer children being born, and thus being placed up for “adoption.” The implications for women being freer to leave abusive and even trafficking relationships, as well as the freedom to escape from the power and control dynamic of rape-related pregnancy, is extensively discussed in Chapter 5 of Jörmungandr.
Likewise, ‘Crime” is a useful construct to fuel this dynamic of human trafficking — not only for a continuous “domestic supply of infants” for well-to-do White couples to adopt, but also as a cheap and plentiful source of labor through what’s known as the 13th Amendment loophole allowing forced labor in prisons, hence the prison industrial complex (and the growing immigrant detention industrial complex). As I argue in Jörmungandr, most issues in modern politics can be traced back to the issue of slavery.
Indeed, racism and slavery also lie at the origin of the so-called “religious” right in the 1970s. According to the sacred founding myth of the modern right, the religious right came to be following the 1973 Supreme Court decision Roe v. Wade. Recalling his horror at the news fourteen years post-Roe, Jerry Farwell recalled that the Supreme Court had made, “a decision by a seven-to-two margin that would legalize the killing of millions of unborn children.”
So goes the myth, at least. The actual history of the creation of the religious right reads a bit differently, however. Following the 1954 decision Brown v. Board of Education, so-called “segregation academies” in the south refused to admit Black students well into the 1970’s. The offenses were so bad that none other than proud advocate of the Southern Strategy President Richard Nixon himself ordered the Internal Revenue Service to deny these schools tax-exempt status as charitable organizations.
The issue reached the Supreme Court, resulting in the 1971 decision Green v. Connally holding that racially discriminatory schools were not entitled to tax-exempt status. Suddenly, universities like Bob Jones University and Jerry Farwell’s own Lynchburg Christian Academy faced a crisis, with Bob Jones losing it’s tax-exempt status for refusing to admit students of color in 1976.
White conservatives were enraged, but they couldn’t exactly organize politically around racial segregation. However, they could argue opposition to abortion as a dog-whistle, or as Paul Weywich and Richard Viguerie euphemistically put it, as a more “high-minded defense.”
The strategy took a while to pay off. Many Southern Baptists initially applauded the ruling in Roe. It was only by the election of Ronald Reagan in 1980 that the tactic began working, bringing conservative Catholics into the so-called “moral” majority.
Thus, much like we saw with the adoption of Satanic and Neo-Nazi imagery by the 764 Network to mask the core motive of nihilistic sadism, the claimed concern for “millions of unborn children” came after the core desire for a return to “separate, but equal” (and the full-fledged slavery before that), with the modern anti-abortion movement as mere window dressing — a polite mask for the root behavior. The fundamental desire was oppression of the other, dressed up in “save the children” language to be more politically appealing, with concern over the state-sanctioned “killing” of the unborn being simply revisionist history.
Confederates and lost-causers certainly are predictable in their preferred methods.
Fast forward to the present day and consider the past fifty plus years of Federalist Society plotting: of course Trump wants to crash the economy, cut social services, and increase policing and detention/incarceration — such policies render populations vulnerable to human trafficking in the first place. Of course RFK wants to send the mentally ill to “work farms” (see Jörmungandr, Chapter 6.) Of course they want to force more people to become homeless and then house them in “asylums” and work camps (see Jörmungandr, Chapter 8.)
Of course ICE is setting up warehouses to commodify human life, all while restricting women’s rights (see Jörmungandr, Chapters 5, 11, and Post-Script). The two go hand-in-hand when it comes to matters of slavery. Criminals can be enslaved via the 13th Amendment loophole and housed in for-profit prisons to generate income, and restricting abortion rights increases crime rates which results in more criminals.
There is a Machiavellian genius to the mechanisms of the political right, and that is the logic of slavery and subjugation.
What’s more, one can see a very direct connection between increased authoritarianism and child trafficking rings specifically. As further evidence, I point to the infant trafficking receipt provided earlier in this section, which tragically bears a connection to the homicidal Pinochet regime in Chile — further still, I suspect, to Colonia Dignidad.
Naturally, Epstein wanted in on all of this.
Real credit for unmasking Hamblin doesn’t belong to Rep. Luna but rather to Shaun King, who identified her first in other Epstein emails — including those in which she gave Epstein her explicit permission to kill people.
Kids2Families is significant as it was not only an adoption agency, but it also provided financial assistance to families who adopted children. In short, it was a grant program for the cause of “adoption.” Kids2Families described itself as,
A non-profit organization established to promote adoption throughout the world. Our fundamental belief is that every child deserves a loving family, and our work is to accomplish that. Currently there are approximately 143 million orphans in the world without loving parents in their lives to care for them. We want to change that.
We are working to create orphanages all over the world that are run by married couples, wherein orphans will be brought to live in family units, have chores, and learn all about the responsibilities and joys of living in a family. That process will prepare them for legal adoption into established families and, if they are not adopted, they will still learn about what it is like to live in a family unit and receive exceptional education. We want to raise these orphans up to be leaders in their communities whether or not they are blessed to be legally adopted.
You’ve all seen this before: it’s the QAnon DARVO of “saving the children,” all while harming children grotesquely. One should note the emphasis on “married couples” and the dog whistles about the “family unit.” (I’ll leave the horrors of what I know about orphanage operations for another post, because I think I’ve broken y’all’s psyches enough in this article.)
Let us not forget what is significant about this: the founder of this organization was apparently best buddies with a notorious pedophile and sex trafficker — Jeffrey Epstein. In fact, she was so close with Epstein that she gave Epstein permission to kill people, and let’s not forget about her “littlest girl.”
Once more, I feel obligated to point out that this is all patriarchal white Christian supremacy. Not Satanism. This is normalcy; this is the system; this is American society. We’re not talking about the exception here, but rather the norm.
This of course brings us to Epstein’s Zorro Ranch in New Mexico, the site of many horrors and clear atrocities. From here, Epstein sought to establish what has not inappropriately been termed a “baby farm” or “baby factory,” complete with his own particular brand of eugenics. Allegedly, he would seek to impregnate up to twenty women at a time, and traffick the children across the black market. Apparently, this constitutes the “darkest” aspect of the Epstein files for some.
Whatever the truth of Zorro Ranch, and I suspect it is likely to include the existence of one such “baby farm,” this is still, tragically, nothing new. Such documented cases are predominant in the literature in both Nigeria as well as Brazil (the latter case we’ll examine shortly) consisting of “buildings, hospitals, or orphanages that have been converted into places for young girls and women to give birth to children for sale on the Black market.”
I wrote about these “baby factories” and breeding programs in Jörmungandr (see Chapter 5, p. 144), but to distract from these and other facts, I was accused of, among other things, somehow magically running the Barnes and Noble website. So the public can be forgiven for not having known about this.
Moreover, one can also see why transgender individuals pose such a threat to the ideology of the heterosexual binary. Once again, this traces back to Epstein’s agenda. See also Chapters 9 and 10 of Jörmungandr.
Once we understand this, it shouldn’t surprise us at all that Epstein’s Zorro Ranch ended up back in the hands of a “pro-family” Trump stooge with connections to InfoWars and the White Nationalist movement, both of whom helped propagate QAnon and Pizzagate in the first place, with the intent to turn the ranch into a “Christian retreat.” Speaking of Zorro Ranch…
The next link in the Epstein chain
The next step in this investigation comes from an email from the Epstein files pertaining to Zorro Ranch.
Take everything that Epstein did. For instance, imagine a predator raping a 12 year-old. Now, imagine doing that in front of her parents as they watched.
Unfortunately, it gets even worse. Now, when that young girl finally confronts her parents, telling them that “he raped me right in front of you and you let it happened,” they respond, “oh no, sweetie, you’re confused — he healed you.”
Folks, meet João Teixeira de Faria — AKA, “John of God.”
Perhaps now maybe you understand why I wanted to do a deep dive into beliefs and how they can be weaponized by predators. de Faria sold himself as a spiritual healer, medium, and “psychic” surgeon. Of course, he was a class-A fraud.
You know this next bit: the person to be “healed” lies down on the table, the “surgeon” folds his hand into the person’s belly, pops a blood capsule, starts pulling some meat or egg from out of the inside of his folded palm, and then presto! The person is all better, there’s no incision (possibly because there was never entry into the body), and whatever tumor the person had has been magically removed.
But de Faria didn’t stop there. Convincing people from literally all around the world of his profound wisdom and special abilities, he raped countless women and girls — convincing them and their parents that the rape was part of the “healing process.” Often, this was done in front of the girls’ families, or in front of groups of other women who were similarly “healed.”
As de Faria’s reputation grew, so did his circle. Business leaders sought his blessing. Religious leaders met with him, and incorporated him into the global religious community. Politicians sought his favor, including multiple Brazilian Supreme Court Justices and at least one President. Oprah platformed him, highlighting his miraculous healing powers. Bill Clinton even befriended him and sought de Faria’s healing magic, because of course he did.
As he became more politically well-connected, de Faria branched out into organized crime. He had his own militias and security forces. He ran extortion rackets. And all the while, more and more women simply kept disappearing around sites where de Faria had business interests. Yet no one would talk.
It turns out that John “of God” was not only raping women, he was abducting them too — and using his paramilitary to keep them hidden and keep people from talking about what he was doing. After obtaining the women, he would rape and impregnate them, forcing them to give birth. He would then sell the children, “adopting” them out to couples around the world. Then, he would rape the women again, continuing the cycle.
After the women had given birth a certain number of times, he would kill them. Mass graves were eventually found on one his farms — you know, sort of like they’re expecting to find at Epstein’s Zorro Ranch.
I am hardly the expert on this case, so I’m going to direct you to the authority on it because of one very important connection to the baby farms of João Teixeira de Faria: that of the Mormon Church, and subsequent child trafficking across the world by religious and adoption authorities. Unfortunately, we have to be very careful to protect witnesses in this line of work, so I apologize for making you have to do some footwork.
From here, y’all are going to want to look into the work of Giulio Ferrari, a forensic journalist and overall good dude who, last I knew, serves as CEO of Under the Rug Exposed, a non-profit that assists children in disclosing abuse to adults and helping them find healing. Their website is:
Now for the record, Ferrari is not my biggest fan — but then again no one really is, plus he’s a solid dude. More importantly, he knows how to connect the case of de Faria’s murderous infant farms to the child trafficking networks that the Mormon Church operates. From here, things get particularly hairy: the CIA has a recruiting agreement with the Mormon Church, and actually prefers to recruit Mormons for some positions — directly implicating them in the people trade. Incidentally, this is likely connected to what Tim Ballard was doing with Operation Underground Railroad and his wife’s international adoption charity (see Jörmungandr chapters 10 and 11, as well as the appendix materials).
I’m sure this has nothing to do with the organized crime problem among SOF and intelligence agencies, including the child trafficking, CSAM, and child abuse problem at Ft. Bragg where a lot of the QAnon mythos can be traced to.
Additionally — and I feel that Mr. Ferrari would back me up on this point based on the conversations I’ve had with him — y’all also need to seriously look into Oprah, as she’s connected to this case in the worst possible way. Victims of de Faria are literally on record as saying, “I was raped by John of God because I saw him on Oprah.”
This is the reality of the Epstein files: it’s not just perverse war criminals, sick financial titans, and ignoble academics who are named in those files for committing unspeakable acts — it’s also your most beloved entertainers, religious officials, and absolute favorite people. It’s also your next door neighbors. That’s how true predators hide: not with grotesque salivation, but with a laugh and a smile, not to mention a plea to “save the children.”
Moreover, a further connection worth investigating that ties Epstein and de Faria to the British Royal family lies just outside of Epstein’s Zorro Ranch, in New Mexico:
Wrapping up: About that anger…
The world’s sorrows are really all connected in the worst possible way. As y’all are finding out, we have been taken over and are governed by a vast, transnational criminal network — and this isn’t a recent development. Jim Stewartson was right when he deemed the Epstein files a limited hangout: they are but a crack in the glass that is a much larger illusion.
For the record, I did try to warn you all that this was occurring, and that you would soon be exposed to it. Of course, the public would have no knowledge of my warning contained in Jörmungandr as they have useful idiots running interference for the predators through their own ignorance and incompetence — all because they want money, attention, or a cybersecurity job at the DNC.
Of particular noteworthiness among the handy stooges was The Atlantic, owned by none other than Laurene Powell Jobs who has herself been pictured laughing with Ghislaine Maxwell by a swimming pool, and whose editor-in-chief is a former IDF prison guard (by the way, that connection to Steve Jobs and Apple computers sure is interesting, isn’t it? I wonder if there’s an AI connection…).
Now, here’s the reason I mention this, besides the fact that I am more than a little pissed off: for one, I keep having to point out these sorts of things because everyone is playing dumb to this dynamic, and I am really fucking tired of this neurotypical melodrama/bullshit.
Secondly, and much more importantly, had such individuals not acted so absolutely goddamned irresponsibly, the public might be better prepared to deal with what they’re now seeing in these files, and other horrors that we’re currently dealing with.
Oh well.